Ultimate Guide for Ontario WSIB Workers' Compensation Claim Denials and WSIAT Appeals
- Kenwat75 & Tony Wong
- Jun 14
- 14 min read
Within Ontario's workers' compensation system, administered by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), countless individuals rely on its provisions to provide essential support following workplace injuries or illnesses. However, the reality is that not all claims are approved. For both employees and employers navigating this complex framework, a clear understanding of the common reasons for claim denial is paramount. This article aims to illuminate these key areas, providing a foundational understanding for the general public in Ontario.
Workers' compensation claims are denied more often than people think. In fact, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, over 2.6 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses were reported in 2023. While many injured workers file claims, a significant number of them are either delayed or denied due to errors or lack of evidence.
When your claim gets rejected, it's easy to feel stuck and frustrated. But don't worry because there are steps after a denied workers' comp claim that can help you appeal and possibly get the benefits you need. You just have to know where to begin.
Relevant Articles that you might be interested in:
WSIB, STD, LTD, and Disability Discrimination Claims for Crush Injuries
Interplay between Long Term Disability, Wrongful Dismissal, Disability Discrimination
The Persistent Myth of the "2-Year" Rule in Disability Cases
Am I Barred From Claiming Constructive Dismissal or Wrongful Dismissal if I Quit Due to Stress
A Legal Analysis on the Medical Documentation in Disability Cases and the Duty to Accommodate
Duty to Investigate and the Sufficiency and Disclosurability of Investigation Reports
Understanding EI Employment Insurance - How It Works and the Eligibility
Topics Will be Covered in Ultimate Guide for Ontario WSIB Workers' Compensation Claim Denials and WSIAT Appeals:
I. Understanding Workers' Compensation Denials
Fundamentally, the WSIB operates under a no-fault system, meaning that fault for the injury is generally not a determining factor in eligibility. However, this does not equate to automatic approval. Several critical criteria must be met for a claim to be successful. Failure to satisfy these criteria forms the bedrock of most claim denials.
Understanding why these claims get denied is the first step toward avoiding common mistakes. Whether it's a missed deadline, lack of paperwork, or a disagreement with your employer, knowing the root causes can help you act wisely and quickly. It also gives you the clarity to appeal the decision or correct the problem before it becomes a bigger issue.
II. Common Reasons for Workers' Comp Denial
a. Eligibility Criteria Not Met:
The initial hurdle involves establishing basic eligibility under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (WSIA). This encompasses several key aspects:
Worker Status: The claimant must qualify as a "worker" under the Act. While the definition is broad, certain categories, such as independent contractors in some circumstances, may be excluded. The nature of the relationship with the employer is a critical determinant.
Employer Coverage: The employer must be covered under Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 of the WSIA. Most Ontario businesses are mandated to have WSIB coverage. Claims involving employers not covered by the system will typically be denied.
Workplace Injury or Illness: Not all injuries are covered by workers' compensation. The injury or illness must arise "out of and in the course of employment." This necessitates a demonstrable link between the work performed and the resulting condition. Injuries sustained outside of working hours or unrelated to job duties are generally not compensable.
If you got hurt while on a personal errand, during your lunch break off company property, or while engaging in non-work-related activities, your claim might be denied.
For a successful claim, you need to show that your injury directly resulted from your job duties. For example, slipping on a wet floor in the office or injuring your back while lifting heavy equipment would likely qualify. On the other hand, injuries that happen outside of work hours or during horseplay usually won’t be covered.
b. Insufficient Evidence of Injury or Illness:
A claim will likely be denied if the worker fails to provide adequate medical evidence to substantiate the existence and nature of the alleged injury or illness. This includes:
Lack of Medical Evidence and Documentation:
A failure to seek timely medical attention and obtain comprehensive medical reports detailing the diagnosis, treatment, and causal relationship to the work is a significant factor in denials.
Without strong medical documentation, your claim may be seen as weak or unsubstantiated. After an injury, always seek immediate medical attention—even if the injury seems small. Your doctor’s notes, diagnostic tests, and treatment plans play a crucial role in proving the severity and cause of your injury.
Additionally, failing to follow your treatment plan can harm your claim. If you skip appointments or stop treatment early, the insurance company may claim you weren’t really hurt or that your condition isn’t serious enough to warrant benefits.
Inconsistent or Conflicting Medical Opinions:
If the medical evidence presented is contradictory or does not clearly support the worker's account of the injury or its work-relatedness, the WSIB may deny the claim.
Pre-existing Conditions:
While the aggravation of a pre-existing condition due to workplace factors can be compensable, the WSIB will scrutinize claims where the current condition appears solely attributable to a pre-existing issue unrelated to work.
If you have a history of health problems, such as chronic back pain or arthritis, insurance companies may use that to deny your claim. They might argue that your injury isn’t new or that it wasn't caused by your current job. That said, having a pre-existing condition doesn't mean you can’t file a claim.
If your work activities worsened your condition, you may still be eligible for compensation. You’ll need clear, detailed medical records to prove that your job aggravated your existing condition.
c. Failure to Properly Report the Injury or Illness in a Timely Manner:
The WSIA mandates that workers report workplace injuries or illnesses to their employer as soon as practicable. There are also timelines for filing a claim with the WSIB. Delays in reporting can raise concerns about the causal link to the workplace and may lead to denial, particularly if the delay prejudices the employer's ability to investigate the incident or the medical condition.
Failure to Properly Report the Injury or Illness
Casually mentioning your injury to a coworker or saying something in passing is not enough. You need to follow your company’s formal reporting procedures. That usually means informing your supervisor or HR department and completing an official incident report.
Without proper documentation, your employer’s insurance company might argue that there is no proof the injury occurred while you were working. Always get your injury in writing and make sure you keep a copy for your own records.
Missed Deadlines
One of the top reasons claims get denied is simply because they weren’t filed on time. Each state has its own rules and deadlines for reporting workplace injuries and submitting claims. Failing to meet these timeframes can result in an automatic denial, regardless of how legitimate your injury is.
If you’re injured, it’s critical to act immediately. Report your injury to your supervisor as soon as possible and ask for the necessary paperwork. Even if the injury seems minor at first, it's better to document it than to wait until it gets worse and find out it’s too late to file a claim.
d. Disputes Regarding the Nature and Circumstances of the Incident:
If there are significant discrepancies or conflicting accounts regarding how the injury or illness occurred, the WSIB will conduct an investigation. Claims may be denied if the investigation findings do not support the worker's version of events or if the circumstances suggest the injury was not work-related. This can involve:
Lack of Witness Evidence:
If there are no witnesses to corroborate the worker's account of the incident.
Employer Disputes:
If the employer contests the work-relatedness of the injury or the worker's description of events.
Sometimes, your employer may challenge your claim altogether. They might say the injury didn’t happen at work, that you weren’t on the clock, or that it wasn’t as serious as you claim.
An employer might dispute a WSIB claim because they disagree with the WSIB's decision, particularly if it grants benefits or services to an employee. Specifically, they might argue the injury wasn't work-related, that the employee isn't truly unable to return to work, or that the WSIB's decision will lead to higher WSIB premiums for the employer.
Reasons Why An Employer Will Challenge the WSIB Claim:
Disagreement with the WSIB's decision: The employer might not agree that the injury is a work-related injury or that the WSIB's decision to grant benefits or services is justified.
Cost concerns: The more WSIB pays out, the higher the employer's WSIB premiums may be, so they may want to dispute the claim to minimize their financial burden.
Work-relatedness: The employer might argue that the injury was not sustained while the employee was performing their job duties.
Return-to-work: The employer might argue that the employee is capable of returning to work, even if they claim they are not.
If your employer disputes your version of events, it’s important to gather as much evidence as possible. Witness statements, security footage, time cards, and emails can all be used to support your claim and show that you were injured on the job.
Inconsistencies in Reporting:
Discrepancies between the worker's initial report to the employer, their claim application, and medical records can raise concerns about credibility and lead to denial.
Inconsistencies between your account of the injury and your medical or employer records can cast doubt on your claim. For example, if you tell your doctor the injury happened on a Friday but your supervisor’s report says Monday, the insurance adjuster may question your credibility.
Be consistent and honest from the very beginning. Write down what happened, when it happened, and who witnessed it. Having a clear and consistent timeline will help support your case.
e. Non-Compensable Conditions:
Certain conditions are generally not compensable under the WSIA, or have specific criteria that must be met. These can include:
Common Illnesses:
Typical colds, flus, or other common ailments not directly linked to a specific workplace exposure are usually not covered.
Stress-Related Claims:
While psychological injuries can be compensable, claims solely based on normal workplace stress often face rigorous scrutiny and may be denied if they do not meet the threshold for a diagnosed mental health condition directly caused by a significant workplace stressor.
Intentional Misconduct:
Injuries resulting solely from a worker's own wilful misconduct are typically not compensable.
Employee Negligence:
Workers’ compensation typically covers injuries regardless of fault, but there are exceptions. If your injury happened because you were under the influence of drugs or alcohol, acting recklessly, or violating company policies, your claim may be denied. For example, if you were operating machinery while impaired or ignoring safety protocols, the insurance company may argue that your own actions caused the injury. Following safety rules and maintaining professionalism at work is essential not only for your safety but also for protecting your right to compensation.
III. Intervening Cause That Breaks the Chain of Causation:
In the context of WSIB claim denials, the legal doctrine of an intervening act, or novus actus interveniens, becomes highly pertinent. An intervening act is an event occurring after the original act or omission that disrupts the causal link to the resulting harm, effectively "breaking the chain of causation."
For WSIB claims, this means:
Original Act (Workplace Injury): The employee sustains a compensable injury or illness arising out of and in the course of employment. This forms the initial "causal link" to the worker's disability and entitlement to benefits.
Intervening Act: Subsequently, an unforeseeable or independent event, entirely separate from the workplace injury, occurs. This new event then becomes the sole or primary cause of the worker's ongoing disability, the worsening of their condition, or a new injury.
Break in Causation: If the WSIB determines that this intervening act has completely severed the causal connection between the original workplace injury and the current state of disability or need for benefits, they may deny or reduce ongoing compensation. The rationale is that the workplace injury is no longer the direct cause of the harm for which benefits are being claimed.
Example: A worker suffers a sprained ankle at work, and the claim is initially accepted. Months later, while fully recovered and off work duties, they slip on ice at home (unrelated to their work injury or its residual effects) and break the same ankle. The WSIB might argue that the slip at home is a novus actus interveniens, breaking the chain of causation from the original workplace sprain, and deny benefits for the broken ankle.
The challenge in these cases lies in the WSIB's adjudication of whether the intervening act truly breaks the chain, or merely contributes to or aggravates a pre-existing work-related condition. If the original workplace injury made the worker more susceptible to the subsequent harm, or if the intervening act was a foreseeable consequence, the chain of causation may not be broken.
The WSIB's task is to discern whether the intervening act represents a complete severance of the causal link to the original workplace injury, or if it merely contributes to, exacerbates, or aggravates a condition that remains, at its root, attributable to the work-related incident:
Breaking the Chain (True Novus Actus):
For the chain of causation to be genuinely broken, the intervening act must be an entirely new and independent cause of the disability, one that was not a foreseeable or probable consequence of the initial workplace injury. It must be so overwhelming in its causal effect that it renders the original workplace injury merely historical, rather than a continuing, operating cause. The subsequent event essentially creates a new injury or new disability that would have occurred regardless of the prior work-related condition.
Contribution or Aggravation (Chain Intact):
Conversely, the chain of causation is typically considered not broken if:
Increased Susceptibility: The original workplace injury rendered the worker more vulnerable or susceptible to the subsequent harm. For instance, a worker with a previously sprained ankle (work-related) might be more prone to re-injury from a minor misstep that would not have affected a healthy ankle. The WSIB often considers if the "residual effects" of the work injury predisposed the worker to the later event.
Foreseeable Consequence: The intervening act, though independent in occurrence, was a reasonably foreseeable or natural consequence of the original injury or its necessary treatment/rehabilitation. For example, if a worker develops a complication from surgery performed to treat a work-related injury, or suffers a further injury during physiotherapy prescribed for a workplace accident, the causal chain often remains intact.
Pre-existing Condition Aggravation: The novus actus merely aggravates a pre-existing work-related condition that was already causing some level of ongoing impairment or disability. In such cases, the WSIB must determine the extent to which the new event contributed to the overall impairment, but the compensable nature of the original injury persists as a contributing factor.
This nuanced distinction mandates a meticulous and often complex evidentiary analysis. Medical opinions from treating physicians and specialists, detailing the progression of the condition, the impact of each event, and the causal nexus, become paramount. Discrepancies, lack of clarity, or conflicting expert views on this specific issue are a perennial source of dispute. Consequently, the determination of whether a novus actus interveniens truly "breaks the chain" or merely "contributes to" an existing compensable condition is a frequently litigated and highly contentious area in appeals before both the WSIB's Appeals Services Division and, ultimately, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT).
IV. The WSIB Appeals Process in Ontario
The appeal journey commences internally within the WSIB itself, typically beginning with reconsideration by the initial decision-maker. Should the worker or employer remain dissatisfied, a formal "Intent to Object" must be filed within strict statutory timelines—generally six months for most issues, but as little as 30 days for return-to-work matters. This triggers a review by the Appeals Services Division (ASD) of the WSIB. An Appeals Resolution Officer (ARO) within the ASD conducts a comprehensive review, considering new evidence and arguments. Their decision constitutes the final position of the WSIB itself.
Should a party disagree with the ARO's decision, the recourse lies with the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT). The WSIAT is an independent, quasi-judicial tribunal, entirely separate from the WSIB. It serves as the final level of appeal for all workers' compensation matters in Ontario. Appeals to the WSIAT also carry specific timelines, typically six months from the ARO's decision. Hearings at the WSIAT can be oral, written, or a combination, and involve a rigorous review of all evidence and submissions by a Vice-Chair or a panel.
Throughout this entire process, critical factors include:
Strict Adherence to Timelines: Missing deadlines can irrevocably forfeit appeal rights.
Comprehensive Evidence Presentation: Success hinges on presenting robust and compelling medical, factual, and legal evidence.
Strategic Advocacy: While not mandatory, legal representation, often by a specialized lawyer or paralegal with expertise in workers' compensation, is highly advisable. Such counsel can significantly enhance a party's ability to navigate procedural complexities, present compelling arguments, and challenge adverse decisions effectively.
Understanding these sequential steps and the strategic imperative at each stage is crucial for any party seeking to challenge a WSIB decision and secure their entitlements or manage their liabilities within the Ontario workers' compensation scheme.
Relevant Articles that You Might be Interested In:
V. Conclusion: Navigating Denial and Asserting Your Rights
A denied workers' compensation claim in Ontario is rarely the definitive end of the road. While the WSIB system operates on a no-fault principle, understanding the common grounds for denial — including issues with eligibility, insufficient medical evidence, untimely reporting, factual disputes, or the presence of non-compensable conditions — is paramount. Being informed about these potential pitfalls is your first line of defense, helping you prevent initial issues and strengthen your claim.
Should your claim face denial, it's crucial to recognize your rights to appeal. Ontario's system provides a structured process, beginning with the WSIB's internal review and extending to the independent Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT). Successfully navigating these complex appeal avenues, understanding the nuances of the denial decision, and gathering necessary evidence can be challenging. Therefore, seeking legal counsel from an experienced Ontario workers' compensation lawyer is not merely advisable but highly recommended at any stage, especially after a denial.
Don't give up if you've been hurt at work and your claim has been denied. By staying informed, meticulously reviewing the decision, and engaging with legal professionals, you can effectively pursue your appeal and fight for the benefits you deserve, ensuring you receive the support you need during a difficult time.
Relevant Articles of Interest:
You may want to consult with an experienced employment law firm, such as HTW Law, to learn about your employment law rights in case of disability discrimination to ensure that your rights are fully protected. By doing so, you can ensure that you receive fair compensation for the actionable discrimination and safeguard your employment rights.
With the right legal support, employees can navigate the challenges of unfair practices and work towards a more equitable and respectful work environment.
You don't have to fight the battle alone. Speaking with an employment lawyer who is familiar with the laws and intricacies regarding disability discrimination will go a long way. If you are in doubt, it's essential that you reach out for help as soon as possible right away.
Click here to contact HTW Law - Employment Lawyer for assistance and legal consultation.
Author Bio:
Ken Wat has been an avid writer since his school days. This passion for writing combined with his background in law made him the writer he is today. He loves to break down complex legal jargon into something that the average Canadian can easily understand. His work has been published on numerous sites across the internet. Ken hopes to become a distinguished lawyer one day and start his own practice
