Under Ontario's Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, the Return to Work (RTW) process is central to injury mitigation. However, despite the statutory duty to re-employ, the system often falters in complex cases. This report critiques the friction between administrative "deeming" policies and actual employability, highlighting how psychological gaps leave workers administratively "restored" yet destitute. It navigates the conflict between legislative intent and WSIB opera

When does tough management become unlawful harassment in Ontario? The OHSA protects "reasonable management," but "bad faith" or "vexatious" conduct creates serious liability. Our new article analyzes the case law that defines this critical line, covering everything from "bad faith" PIPs to virtual harassment.

Effective workplace harassment prevention exceeds mere compliance. It demands proactive leadership and ongoing diligence. Robust policies, regular training, and strict adherence to evolving legal standards are essential to mitigate liability and ensure a respectful, productive, and compliant workplace. Prioritizing prevention is not just a best practice; it is a legal imperative fundamental to sound corporate governance and risk management.

Workplace safety and employer negligence represent a delicate legal balance between protecting workers and allowing businesses reasonable leeway to operate. Employers must adopt measures that a prudent employer would take under similar circumstances, while employees retain legal recourse when serious lapses occur. Injured workers benefit greatly from prompt reporting, careful evidence preservation, and competent legal advocacy.

Employee use of supplements like Turkesterone creates complex legal duties. Your obligations are governed by 3 key areas: Human Rights Codes, requiring you to accommodate potential disabilities (including dependence) to the point of undue hardship; Occupational Health & Safety acts, mandating a safe, impairment-free workplace; and Employment Standards, governing fair discipline. Focus not on the substance, but on objective job performance and safety. Follow the accommodation

Workplace disputes, from wrongful termination to harassment and wage issues, can turn a job into a legal battle. Employment law sets standards to protect employees and define employer obligations. When physical or psychological harm occurs, the line between a workplace injury (covered by WSIB) and a personal injury can be blurry. Understanding the intersection of employment law, employee rights, personal injury claims is vital. We further explores how to determine if an injur

We will compare Toronto and Houston anti-harassment laws. Toronto, under OHSA, broadly defines harassment, including bullying, offering flexible recourse (human rights claims, constructive dismissal). Houston's Title VII is stricter: harassment must be "severe or pervasive" and tied to protected characteristics, with a firm 180-day EEOC filing deadline. The guide emphasizes that diligent documentation is crucial for employees, while proactive policy enforcement is the best de

We examines the intricate legal relationship between wrongful death, employment law, and disability accommodation. WSIB typically prevents families from suing an employer directly for a work-related death. A viable strategy, therefore, is to pursue a claim against a negligent third party while using the employer's failure to accommodate as a key element of the causal narrative. With proper legal guidance, families can find hope and justice, even in the most challenging circum

Off-duty behavior like stunt driving may seem like a personal mistake, but in certain employment settings, it can have professional consequences. The answer depends on several factors, including the nature of your role, the terms of your employment contract, and how your actions are perceived in relation to your employer’s reputation and workplace policies. This article explores the nuanced relationship between off-duty behavior and employment law consequences in Ontario.